Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Experimentally Feasible Security Check for n-qubit Quantum Secret Sharing
arXiv
Authors: Stefan Schauer, Marcus Huber, Beatrix C. Hiesmayr
Year
2010
Paper ID
11142
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
126
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this article we present a general security strategy for quantum secret sharing (QSS) protocols based on the HBB scheme presented by Hillery, Bužek and Berthiaume \[Phys. Rev A 59, 1829 (1999)\]. We focus on a generalization of the HBB protocol to n communication parties thus including n-partite GHZ states. We show that the multipartite version of the HBB scheme is insecure in certain settings and impractical when going to large n. To provide security for such QSS schemes in general we use the framework presented by some of the authors \[M. Huber, F. Minert, A. Gabriel, B. C. Hiesmayr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 210501 (2010)\] to detect certain genuine n partite entanglement between the communication parties. In particular, we present a simple inequality which tests the security.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this article we present a general security strategy for quantum secret sharing (QSS) protocols based on the HBB scheme presented by Hillery, Bužek and Berthiaume [Phys.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.