Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Single Cs Atoms as Collisional Probes in a large Rb Magneto-Optical Trap

arXiv
Authors: Claudia Weber, Shincy John, Nicolas Spethmann, Dieter Meschede, Artur Widera

Year

2010

Paper ID

10986

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

93

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study cold inter-species collisions of Caesium and Rubidium in a strongly imbalanced system with single and few Cs atoms. Observation of the single atom fuorescence dynamics yields insight into light-induced loss mechanisms, while both subsystems can remain in steady-state. This significantly simplifies the analysis of the dynamics, as Cs-Cs collisions are effectively absent and the majority component remains unaffected, allowing us to extract a precise value of the Rb-Cs collision parameter. Extending our results to ground state collisions would allow to use single neutral atoms as coherent probes for larger quantum systems.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study cold inter-species collisions of Caesium and Rubidium in a strongly imbalanced system with single and few Cs atoms.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #10986 #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68453 Weak wave turbulence as a precu... #68449 Scale-Invariant Open Quantum Sy...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.