Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Fano type quantum inequalities in terms of q-entropies

arXiv
Authors: Alexey E. Rastegin

Year

2010

Paper ID

10934

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

103

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Generalizations of the quantum Fano inequality are considered. The notion of q-entropy exchange is introduced. This quantity is concave in each of its two arguments. For qgeq0, the inequality of Fano type with q-entropic functionals is established. The notion of coherent information and the perfect reversibility of a quantum operation are discussed in the context of q-entropies. By the monotonicity property, the lower bound of Pinsker type in terms of the trace norm distance is obtained for the Tsallis relative q-entropy of order q=1/2. For 0leq{q}leq2, Fano type quantum inequalities with freely variable parameters are obtained.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Generalizations of the quantum Fano inequality are considered.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #10934 #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi... #68981 Affine Filtering Measurements a... #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.