Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Comment on "Comment on 'Supersymmetry, PT-symmetry and spectral bifurcation'"
arXiv
Authors: Kumar Abhinav, Prasanta K. Panigrahi
Year
2010
Paper ID
10926
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
117
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In "Comment on Supersymmetry, PT-symmetry and spectral bifurcation" \cite{BQ1}, Bagchi and Quesne correctly show the presence of a class of states for the complex Scarf-II potential in the unbroken PT-symmetry regime, which were absent in \cite{AP}. However, in the spontaneously broken PT-symmetry case, their argument is incorrect since it fails to implement the condition for the potential to be PT-symmetric: CPT[2(A-B)+α]=0. It needs to be emphasized that in the models considered in \cite{AP}, PT is spontaneously broken, implying that the potential is PT- symmetric, whereas the ground state is not. Furthermore, our supersymmetry (SUSY)-based 'spectral bifurcation' holds independent of the sl(2) symmetry consideration for a large class of PT-symmetric potentials.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In "Comment on Supersymmetry, PT-symmetry and spectral bifurcation" citeBQ1, Bagchi and Quesne correctly show the presence of a class of states for the complex Scarf-II...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.