Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

Tight lower bound to the geometric measure of quantum discord

arXiv
Authors: Ali Saif M. Hassan, Behzad Lari, Pramod S. Joag

Year

2010

Paper ID

10925

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

105

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Dakic, Vedral and Brukner \[Physical Review Letters \tf{105},190502 (2010)\] gave a geometric measure of quantum discord in a bipartite quantum state as the distance of the state from the closest classical quantum (or zero discord) state and derived an explicit formula for a two qubit state. Further, S.Luo and S.Fu \[Physical Review A \tf{82}, 034302 (2010)\] obtained a generic form of this geometric measure for a general bipartite state and established a lower bound. In this brief report we obtain a rigorous lower bound to the geometric measure of quantum discord in a general bipartite state which dominates that obtained by S.Luo and S.Fu.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Dakic, Vedral and Brukner [Physical Review Letters tf105,190502 (2010)] gave a geometric measure of quantum discord in a bipartite quantum state as the distance of the state...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #10925 #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68426 On the Approximate Non-Determin... #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68453 Weak wave turbulence as a precu...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.