Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Gaussian flexibility with Fourier accuracy: the periodic von Neumann basis set
arXiv
Authors: Asaf Shimshovitz, David J. Tannor
Year
2010
Paper ID
10879
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
162
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose a new method for solving quantum mechanical problems, which combines the flexibility of Gaussian basis set methods with the numerical accuracy of the Fourier method. The method is based on the incorporation of periodic boundary conditions into the von Neumann basis of phase space Gaussians [F. Dimler et al., New J. Phys. 11, 105052 (2009)]. In this paper we focus on the Time-independent Schrödinger Equation and show results for the harmonic, Morse and Coulomb potentials that demonstrate that the periodic von Neumann method or pvN is significantly more accurate than the usual vN method. Formally, we are able to show an exact equivalence between the pvN and the Fourier Grid Hamiltonian (FGH) methods. Moreover, due to the locality of the pvN functions we are able to remove Gaussian basis functions without loss of accuracy, and obtain significantly better efficiency than that of the FGH. We show that in the classical limit the method has the remarkable efficiency of 1 basis function per 1 eigenstate.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We propose a new method for solving quantum mechanical problems, which combines the flexibility of Gaussian basis set methods with the numerical accuracy of the Fourier method.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.