Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Any 2otimes n subspace is locally distinguishable
arXiv
Authors: Nengkun Yu, Runyao Duan, Mingsheng Ying
Year
2010
Paper ID
10873
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
115
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A subspace of a multipartite Hilbert space is called locally indistinguishable if any orthogonal basis of this subspace cannot be perfectly distinguished by local operations and classical communication. Previously it was shown that any motimes n bipartite system such that m>2 and n>2 has a locally indistinguishable subspace. However, it has been an open problem since 2005 whether there is a locally indistinguishable bipartite subspace with a qubit subsystem. We settle this problem by showing that any 2otimes n bipartite subspace is locally distinguishable in the sense it contains a basis perfectly distinguishable by LOCC. As an interesting application, we show that any quantum channel with two Kraus operations has optimal environment-assisted classical capacity.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A subspace of a multipartite Hilbert space is called locally indistinguishable if any orthogonal basis of this subspace cannot be perfectly distinguished by local operations...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.