Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Hysteresis and intermittency in a nano-bridge based suspended DC-SQUID

arXiv
Authors: Eran Segev, Oren Suchoi, Oleg Shtempluck, Fei Xue, Eyal Buks

Year

2010

Paper ID

10759

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

89

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study voltage response of nano-bridge based DC-SQUID fabricated on a Si_{3}N_{4} membrane. Such a configuration may help in reducing 1/f noise, which originates from substrate fluctuating defects. We find that the poor thermal coupling between the DC-SQUID and the substrate leads to strong hysteretic response of the SQUID, even though it is biased by an alternating current. In addition, when the DC-SQUID is biased near a threshold of spontaneous oscillations, the measured voltage has an intermittent pattern, which depends on the applied magnetic flux through the SQUID.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study voltage response of nano-bridge based DC-SQUID fabricated on a Si_3N_4 membrane.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #10759 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78829 Graphene double quantum dot as ... #78817 Modelling Josephson Junctions w... #78809 A quasiparticle-protected super...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.