Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits

Quantitative evaluation of defect-models in superconducting phase qubits

arXiv
Authors: J. H. Cole, C. Müller, P. Bushev, G. J. Grabovskij, J. Lisenfeld, A. Lukashenko, A. V. Ustinov, A. Shnirman

Year

2010

Paper ID

10651

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

69

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We use high-precision spectroscopy and detailed theoretical modelling to determine the form of the coupling between a superconducting phase qubit and a two-level defect. Fitting the experimental data with our theoretical model allows us to determine all relevant system parameters. A strong qubit-defect coupling is observed, with a nearly vanishing longitudinal component. Using these estimates, we quantitatively compare several existing theoretical models for the microscopic origin of two-level defects.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We use high-precision spectroscopy and detailed theoretical modelling to determine the form of the coupling between a superconducting phase qubit and a two-level defect.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #10651 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78829 Graphene double quantum dot as ... #78817 Modelling Josephson Junctions w... #78809 A quasiparticle-protected super...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.