Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Pseudo-Entanglement Evaluated in Noninertial Frames

arXiv
Authors: Hossein Mehri-Dehnavi, Behrouz Mirza, Hosein Mohammadzadeh, Robabeh Rahimi

Year

2010

Paper ID

10547

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

94

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study quantum discord, in addition to entanglement, of bipartite pseudo-entanglement in noninertial frames. It is shown that the entanglement degrades from its maximum value in a stationary frame to a minimum value in an infinite accelerating frame. There is a critical region found in which, for particular cases, entanglement of states vanishes for certain accelerations. The quantum discord of pseudo-entanglement decreases by increasing the acceleration. Also, for a physically inaccessible region, entanglement and nonclassical correlation are evaluated and shown to match the corresponding values of the physically accessible region for an infinite acceleration.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study quantum discord, in addition to entanglement, of bipartite pseudo-entanglement in noninertial frames.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #10547 #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68426 On the Approximate Non-Determin... #68463 Full characterization of inform... #68461 Agreement and Compatibility in ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.