Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Analytic control methods for high fidelity unitary operations in a weakly nonlinear oscillator
arXiv
Authors: J. M. Gambetta, F. Motzoi, S. T. Merkel, F. K. Wilhelm
Year
2010
Paper ID
10519
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
105
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In qubits made from a weakly anharmonic oscillator the leading source of error at short gate times is leakage of population out of the two dimensional Hilbert space that forms the qubit. In this paper we develop a general scheme based on an adiabatic expansion to find pulse shapes that correct this type of error. We find a family of solutions that allows tailoring to what is practical to implement for a specific application. Our result contains and improves the previously developed DRAG technique [F. Motzoi, et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 110501 (2009)] and allows a generalization to other non-linear oscillators with more than one leakage transition.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In qubits made from a weakly anharmonic oscillator the leading source of error at short gate times is leakage of population out of the two dimensional Hilbert space that forms...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.