Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Entanglement-fidelity relations for inaccurate ancilla-driven quantum computation

arXiv
Authors: Tomoyuki Morimae, Jonas Kahn

Year

2010

Paper ID

10388

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

98

Citations

N/A

Abstract

It was shown in \[T. Morimae, Phys. Rev. A {\bf81}, 060307(R) (2010)\] that the gate fidelity of an inaccurate one-way quantum computation is upper bounded by a decreasing function of the amount of entanglement in the register. This means that a strong entanglement causes the low gate fidelity in the one-way quantum computation with inaccurate measurements. In this paper, we derive similar entanglement-fidelity relations for the inaccurate ancilla-driven quantum computation. These relations again imply that a strong entanglement in the register causes the low gate fidelity in the ancilla-driven quantum computation if the measurements on the ancilla are inaccurate.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • It was shown in [T.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #10388 #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi... #68981 Affine Filtering Measurements a... #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.