You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Compilation Routing Architecture Quantum Device Fabrication Process Engineering Quantum Control Electronics System Integration Quantum Chemistry

Toxicity and biodistribution comparison of functionalized nanodiamonds, quantum dot nanocarbons and gold nanoparticles

DOAJ
Authors: Elena Alexander, Kam W. Leong

Year

2025

Paper ID

10295

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

233

Citations

21

Abstract

IntroductionNanomaterials are extensively utilized in applications ranging from electronics to biomedical therapies; however, their widespread use has prompted concerns about potential toxicity in humans. Understanding the biodistribution and toxicity profiles of nanoparticles is crucial for their safe application.MethodsThis study assessed the dose-dependent toxicity and biodistribution of unconjugated nanodiamonds, nanobody-conjugated nanodiamonds, gold nanoparticles, and quantum dot nanocarbons in 22 female C57BL/6 mice. Nanoparticles were intravenously administered at concentrations of 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg. Samples were collected at 2, 24, and 96 hours post-administration to evaluate tolerability, immune responses, and biodistribution patterns.ResultsUnconjugated nanodiamonds showed favorable tolerability, eliciting minimal inflammatory responses and significantly lower memory T cell activation compared to gold nanoparticles and quantum dot nanocarbons. Nanobody-conjugated nanodiamonds triggered moderate inflammation at 2 hours post-dosing. Specifically, CD69 expression in CD8+ T cells was highest in the gold nanoparticle group (mean: 0.40 ± 0.16) and lowest in the unconjugated nanodiamond group (mean: 0.12 ± 0.09). CD25 expression was most elevated in quantum dot nanocarbons (mean: 0.23 ± 0.04) and lowest in nanobody-conjugated nanodiamonds (mean: 0.09 ± 0.04). Total T cells were highest in the nanobody-conjugated group (mean: 49.10% ± 6.99) and lowest in the unconjugated nanodiamond group (mean: 40.70% ± 8.10). Nanodiamonds primarily accumulated in the heart, whereas gold nanoparticles localized mainly in the left lung, and quantum dot nanocarbons predominantly persisted in the kidney, liver, blood, and heart.DiscussionThese results indicate that nanodiamonds exhibit favorable tolerability and controlled immune responses compared to gold nanoparticles and quantum dot nanocarbons, highlighting their potential as safer nanomaterials for biomedical applications.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • IntroductionNanomaterials are extensively utilized in applications ranging from electronics to biomedical therapies; however, their widespread use has prompted concerns about...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #10295 #68465 Bounding Eigenstate Overlap fro... #68464 Hybrid Classical-Quantum Neural... #68440 Classical State Preparation for... #68437 Transition-state lattice modes ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-11 21:45:33

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.