Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Quantum Simulation
Revisiting Vacuum Simulations Using Modern Classical Protein Force Fields.
PubMed
Authors: Lam VT, Tran DP
Year
2026
Paper ID
10224
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
143
Citations
N/A
Abstract
With the recent extensive improvement of classical biomolecular force fields in solution, the performance of these in vacuum simulations remains unclear. In this work, we perform extensive replica exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) to compare the recent modern force fields. Therefore, we investigate the sampling conformations of the force fields and perform quantum mechanical total energy calculations. We found that the treatment of CMAP or dihedral angle functions does not strongly affect the sampling of the force fields in vacuum simulations, but the inter-residue mainchain-side chain interaction may play important roles. In addition, the sampling area in PC space and the radius of gyration versus N-terminus to C-terminus distances are not dominantly the highest in all cases using ff14SB, but are cumulatively the highest across the 9 peptides in this work. This information may help support the development of future universal transferable force fields.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- With the recent extensive improvement of classical biomolecular force fields in solution, the performance of these in vacuum simulations remains unclear.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.