Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance Superconducting Qubits

Microwave-multiplexed qubit controller using adiabatic superconductor logic

arXiv
Authors: Naoki Takeuchi, Taiki Yamae, Taro Yamashita, Tsuyoshi Yamamoto, Nobuyuki Yoshikawa

Year

2023

Paper ID

53979

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

168

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Cryogenic qubit controllers (QCs) are the key to build large-scale superconducting quantum processors. However, developing scalable QCs is challenging because the cooling power of a dilution refrigerator is too small ( 10 $μ$W at 10 mK) to operate conventional logic families, such as complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor logic and superconducting single-flux-quantum logic, near qubits. Here we report on a scalable QC using an ultra-low-power superconductor logic family, namely adiabatic quantum-flux-parametron (AQFP) logic. The AQFP-based QC, referred to as the AQFP-multiplexed QC (AQFP-mux QC), produces multi-tone microwave signals for qubit control with an extremely small power dissipation of 81.8 pW per qubit. Furthermore, the AQFP-mux QC adopts microwave multiplexing to reduce the number of coaxial cables for operating the entire system. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate an AQFP-mux QC chip that produces microwave signals at two output ports through microwave multiplexing and demultiplexing. Experimental results show an output power of approximately $-$80 dBm and on/off ratio of 40 dB at each output port. Basic mixing operation is also demonstrated by observing sideband signals.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #53979 #59479 Dynamics and transport in the b... #59470 Coherent optical-microwave inte... #59444 Qubit-oscillator concatenated c...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.