Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

LightStim: A Framework for QEC Protocol Evaluation and Prototyping with Automated DEM Construction

arXiv
Authors: Xiang Fang, Ming Wang, Yue Wu, Sharanya Prabhu, Dean Tullsen, Narasinga Rao Miniskar, Frank Mueller, Travis Humble, Yufei Ding

Year

2026

Paper ID

52154

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

157

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Fault-tolerant quantum computing increasingly demands rigorous, circuit-level evaluation of diverse quantum error correction (QEC) protocols and efficient prototyping of new ones. Such evaluation requires both the physical circuit and its Detector Error Model (DEM) to simulate end-to-end logical error rates. However, DEM construction today is performed by manual annotation, a tedious and error-prone process that effectively limits evaluation to simple memory experiments. We present LightStim, a framework that automates DEM construction concurrently with circuit compilation by maintaining a Pauli tableau augmented with measurement records, with no protocol-specific input required. We benchmark LightStim across protocols from memory experiments to end-to-end distillation circuits; cross-validation against public implementations confirms exact detector and observable counts and consistent logical error rates. LightStim additionally accelerates the exploration of new protocols, which we demonstrate through a novel heterogeneous cross-code lattice surgery design between surface and punctured quantum Reed-Muller codes. These capabilities together make LightStim a unified infrastructure for systematic QEC protocol evaluation and exploration.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #52154

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.