Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Quantum Simulation
Code switching revisited: Low-overhead magic state preparation using color codes
arXiv
Authors: Lucas Daguerre, Isaac H. Kim
Year
2024
Paper ID
38305
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
195
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose a protocol to prepare a high-fidelity magic state on a two-dimensional (2D) color code using a three-dimensional (3D) color code. Our method modifies the known code switching protocol with (i) a recently discovered transversal gate between the 2D and the 3D code and (ii) a judicious use of flag-based postselection. We numerically demonstrate that these modifications lead to a significant improvement in the fidelity of the magic state. For instance, subjected to a uniform circuit-level noise of $10^{-3}$ (excluding idling noise), our code switching protocol yields a magic state encoded in the distance-$3$ 2D color code with a logical infidelity of $4.6\times 10^{-5}\pm 1.6 \times 10^{-5}$ (quantified by an error-corrected logical state tomography) with an $84\%$ of acceptance rate. Used in conjunction with a postselection approach, extrapolation from a polynomial fit suggests a fidelity improvement to $5.1 \times 10^{-7}$ for the same code. Our protocol is aimed for architectures that allow nonlocal connectivity and should be readily implementable in near-term devices. Finally, we also present a simulation technique akin to an extended stabilizer simulator which effectively incorporates the non-Clifford $T$-gate, that permits to simulate the protocol without resorting to a resource intensive state-vector simulation.
Paper Tools
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.