Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Universal graph representation of stabilizer codes
arXiv
Authors: Andrey Boris Khesin, Jonathan Z. Lu, Peter W. Shor
Year
2024
Paper ID
37023
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
219
Citations
N/A
Abstract
While stabilizer tableaus have proven useful as a descriptive tool for additive quantum codes, they otherwise offer little guidance for concrete constructions or algorithm analysis. We introduce a representation of stabilizer codes as graphs with certain structures, and prove via the ZX Calculus that this representation is related to stabilizer tableaus by an efficiently computable bijection. This gives a new universal recipe for code construction by way of finding graphs with nice properties. The graph representation gives insight into both code construction and algorithms. We construct as examples families of $\[[ n, \;Θ\(\frac{n}{\log n}\), \;Θ\(\log n\)\]]$ and $\[[ n, \;Ω\(n^{4/5}\), \;Θ\(n^{1/5}\)\]]$ codes. We use graphs in a probabilistic analysis to extend the quantum Gilbert-Varshamov bound into a three-way distance-rate-weight trade-off. Moreover, code properties such as distance and encoding circuit depth are bounded by simple functions of the graph degree. We prove that key coding algorithms - distance approximation, minimum weight generator selection, and decoding - are unified as instances of one optimization game on a graph. By studying this game, we construct an efficient greedy decoder and prove that it corrects all recoverable errors for all graphs with cycle lengths no shorter than 13 (reducible to 5 with mild extra constraints); these include the above two families. Our results suggest that graphs are generically useful for the study of stabilizer codes.
Paper Tools
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.