Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance Quantum Machine Learning Quantum Simulation

GPU-Accelerated Quantum Simulation of Stabilizer Circuits

arXiv
Authors: Muhammad Osama, Dimitrios Thanos, Alfons Laarman

Year

2026

Paper ID

30800

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

156

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We introduce new parallel algorithms for efficiently simulating stabilizer (Clifford) circuits on GPUs, with a focus on data-parallel tableau evolution and scalable handling of projective measurements. Our approach reformulates key bottlenecks in stabilizer simulation - such as Gaussian elimination and measurement updates - into GPU-tailored primitives that eliminate sequential dependencies and maximize memory coalescing. We implement these techniques in QuaSARQ, a GPU-accelerated stabilizer simulator designed for large qubit counts and many-shot sampling. Across a broad benchmark suite reaching 180,000 qubits and depth 1,000 (roughly 130M gates), QuaSARQ shows substantial runtime improvements, with up to 105$\times$ speedup, and over 80% energy reduction on demanding instances. Moreover, QuaSARQ consistently outperforms Stim, a state-of-the-art CPU-optimized stabilizer simulator, as well as Qiskit-Aer (CPU/GPU), Qibo, Cirq, and PennyLane. Finally, QuaSARQ exhibits a significant advantage in many-shot sampling on large workloads. These results demonstrate that our parallel algorithms can significantly advance the scalability of stabilizer-circuit simulation, particularly for workloads involving extensive measurements and sampling.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #30800 #56297 A comprehensive survey on quant... #56241 Centimeter-scale nanomechanical... #56317 Spatial inversion symmetry brea... #56313 Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanic...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.