Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
High-threshold magic state distillation with quantum quadratic residue codes
arXiv
Authors: Michael Zurel, Santanil Jana, Nadish de Silva
Year
2026
Paper ID
30570
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
121
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present applications of quantum quadratic residue codes in magic state distillation. This includes showing that existing codes which are known to distill magic states, like the 5-qubit perfect code, the 7-qubit Steane code, and the 11-qutrit and 23-qubit Golay codes, are equivalent to certain quantum quadratic residue codes. We also present new examples of quantum quadratic residue codes that distill qubit T states and qutrit Strange states with high thresholds, and we show that there are infinitely many quantum quadratic residue codes that distill T states with a non-trivial threshold. All of these codes, including the codes with the highest currently known thresholds for T state and Strange state distillation, are unified under the umbrella of quantum quadratic residue codes.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present applications of quantum quadratic residue codes in magic state distillation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.