Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Permutation-invariant codes: a numerical study and qudit constructions
arXiv
Authors: Liam J. Bond, Jiří Minář, Māris Ozols, Arghavan Safavi-Naini, Vladyslav Visnevskyi
Year
2026
Paper ID
28455
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
238
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We investigate Permutation-Invariant (PI) quantum error-correcting codes encoding a logical qudit of dimension $\mathrm{d}_\mathrm{L}$ in PI states using physical qudits of dimension $\mathrm{d}_\mathrm{P}$. We extend the Knill--Laflamme (KL) conditions for $d-1$ deletion errors from qubits to qudits and investigate numerically both qubit \($\mathrm{d}_\mathrm{L} = \mathrm{d}_\mathrm{P} = 2$\) and qudit \($\mathrm{d}_\mathrm{L} > 2$ or $\mathrm{d}_\mathrm{P} > 2$\) PI codes. We analyze the scaling of the block length $n$ in terms of the code distance $d$, and compare to existing families of PI codes due to Ouyang, Aydin--Alekseyev--Barg (AAB) and Pollatsek--Ruskai (PR). Our three main findings are: (i) We conjecture that qubit PI codes correcting up to $d-1$ deletion errors have block length $n(d) \geq \(3d^2 + 1\) / 4$, which implies an upper bound $d \leq \sqrt{12n-3}/3$ on their code distance, and that PR codes can saturate this bound. (ii) For qudit PI codes encoding a single qudit we numerically observe that increasing $\mathrm{d}_\mathrm{P}$ results in $n$ monotonically decreasing and approaching the quantum Singleton bound $n(d) \geq 2d-1$. (iii) We propose a semi-analytic extension of the qubit AAB construction to qudits that finds explicit solutions by solving a linear program. Our results therefore provide key insights into lower bounds on the block length scaling of both qubit and qudit PI codes, and demonstrate the benefit of increased physical local dimension in the context of PI codes.
Paper Tools
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.