Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Overflow-Safe Polylog-Time Parallel Minimum-Weight Perfect Matching Decoder: Toward Experimental Demonstration
arXiv
Authors: Ryo Mikami, Hayata Yamasaki
Year
2026
Paper ID
25856
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
198
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Fault-tolerant quantum computation (FTQC) requires fast and accurate decoding of quantum errors, which is often formulated as a minimum-weight perfect matching (MWPM) problem. A determinant-based approach has been proposed as a promising method to surpass the conventional polynomial runtime of MWPM decoding via the blossom algorithm, asymptotically achieving polylogarithmic parallel runtime. However, the existing approach requires an impractically large bit length to represent intermediate values during the computation of the matrix determinant; moreover, when implemented on a finite-bit machine, the algorithm cannot detect overflow, and therefore, the mathematical correctness of such algorithms cannot be guaranteed. In this work, we address these issues by presenting a polylog-time MWPM decoder that detects overflow in finite-bit representations by employing an algebraic framework over a truncated polynomial ring. Within this framework, all arithmetic operations are implemented using bitwise XOR and shift operations, enabling efficient and hardware-friendly implementation. Furthermore, with algorithmic optimizations tailored to the structure of the determinant-based approach, we reduce the arithmetic bit length required to represent intermediate values in the determinant computation by more than $99.9\%$, while preserving its polylogarithmic runtime scaling. These results open the possibility of a proof-of-principle demonstration of the polylog-time MPWM decoding in the early FTQC regime.
Paper Tools
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.