Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance Quantum Simulation

Magic state distillation with punctured polar codes

arXiv
Authors: Anirudh Krishna, Jean-Pierre Tillich

Year

2018

Paper ID

23503

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

182

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We present a scheme for magic state distillation using punctured polar codes. Our results build on some recent work by Bardet et al. (ISIT, 2016) who discovered that polar codes can be described algebraically as decreasing monomial codes. Using this powerful framework, we construct tri-orthogonal quantum codes (Bravyi et al., PRA, 2012) that can be used to distill magic states for the $T$ gate. An advantage of these codes is that they permit the use of the successive cancellation decoder whose time complexity scales as $O\(N\log(N\))$. We supplement this with numerical simulations for the erasure channel and dephasing channel. We obtain estimates for the dimensions and error rates for the resulting codes for block sizes up to $2^{20}$ for the erasure channel and $2^{16}$ for the dephasing channel. The dimension of the triply-even codes we obtain is shown to scale like $O\(N^{0.8}\)$ for the binary erasure channel at noise rate $0.01$ and $O\(N^{0.84}\)$ for the dephasing channel at noise rate $0.001$. The corresponding bit error rates drop to roughly $8\times10^{-28}$ for the erasure channel and $7 \times 10^{-15}$ for the dephasing channel respectively.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #23503 #35360 Implementing arbitrary phase ga... #35401 Room-temperature implementation... #35400 Building a spin quantum bit reg... #35396 Fault tolerance with noisy and ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.