Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance Quantum Simulation

Efficient magic state cultivation with lattice surgery

arXiv
Authors: Yutaka Hirano, Riki Toshio, Tomohiro Itogawa, Keisuke Fujii

Year

2025

Paper ID

17962

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

176

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Magic state distillation plays a crucial role in fault-tolerant quantum computation and represents a major bottleneck. In contrast to traditional logical-level distillation, physical-level distillation offers significant overhead reduction by enabling direct implementation with physical gates. Magic state cultivation is a state-of-the-art physical-level distillation protocol that is compatible with the square-grid connectivity and yields high-fidelity magic states. However, it relies on the complex grafted code, which incurs substantial spacetime overhead and complicates practical implementation. In this work, we propose an efficient cultivation-based protocol compatible with the square-grid connectivity. We reduce the spatial overhead by avoiding the grafted code and further reduce the average spacetime overhead by utilizing code expansion and enabling early rejection. Numerical simulations show that, with a color code distance of 3 and a physical error probability of $10^{-3}$, our protocol achieves a logical error probability for the resulting magic state comparable to that of magic state cultivation \($\approx 3 \times 10^{-6}$\), while requiring about half the spacetime overhead. Our work provides an efficient and simple distillation protocol suitable for megaquop use cases and early fault-tolerant devices.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #17962 #51897 Tradeoffs on the volume of faul... #51894 To break, or not to break: Symm... #51890 Bounds on Atomistic Disorder fo... #51884 Absence of quantum Darwinism as...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.