Compare Papers

Paper 1

Co-Designed Superconducting Architecture for Lattice Surgery of Surface Codes with Quantum Interface Routing Card

Charles Guinn, Samuel Stein, Esin Tureci, Guus Avis, Chenxu Liu, Stefan Krastanov, Andrew A. Houck, Ang Li

Year

2023

Journal

arXiv preprint

DOI

arXiv:2312.01246

arXiv

2312.01246

Facilitating the ability to achieve logical qubit error rates below physical qubit error rates, error correction is anticipated to play an important role in scaling quantum computers. While many algorithms require millions of physical qubits to be executed with error correction, current superconducting qubit systems contain only hundreds of physical qubits. One of the most promising codes on the superconducting qubit platform is the surface code, requiring a realistically attainable error threshold and the ability to perform universal fault-tolerant quantum computing with local operations via lattice surgery and magic state injection. Surface code architectures easily generalize to single-chip planar layouts, however space and control hardware constraints point to limits on the number of qubits that can fit on one chip. Additionally, the planar routing on single-chip architectures leads to serialization of commuting gates and strain on classical decoding caused by large ancilla patches. A distributed multi-chip architecture utilizing the surface code can potentially solve these problems if one can optimize inter-chip gates, manage collisions in networking between chips, and minimize routing hardware costs. We propose QuIRC, a superconducting Quantum Interface Routing Card for Lattice Surgery between surface code modules inside of a single dilution refrigerator. QuIRC improves scaling by allowing connection of many modules, increases ancilla connectivity of surface code lattices, and offers improved transpilation of Pauli-based surface code circuits. QuIRC employs in-situ Entangled Pair (EP) generation protocols for communication. We explore potential topological layouts of QuIRC based on superconducting hardware fabrication constraints, and demonstrate reductions in ancilla patch size by up to 77.8%, and in layer transpilation size by 51.9% when compared to the single-chip case.

Open paper

Paper 2

Sampling random quantum circuits: a pedestrian's guide

Sean Mullane

Year

2020

Journal

arXiv preprint

DOI

arXiv:2007.07872

arXiv

2007.07872

Recent experiments completed by collaborating research groups from Google, NASA Ames, UC Santa Barbara, and others provided compelling evidence that quantum supremacy has finally been achieved on a superconducting quantum processor. The theoretical basis for these experiments depends on sampling the output distributions of random quantum circuits; unfortunately, understanding how this theoretical basis can be used to define quantum supremacy is an extremely difficult task. Anyone attempting to understand how this sampling task relates to quantum supremacy must study concepts from random matrix theory, mathematical analysis, quantum chaos, computational complexity, and probability theory. Resources connecting these concepts in the context of quantum supremacy are scattered and often difficult to find. This article is an attempt to alleviate this difficulty in those who wish to understand the theoretical basis of Google's quantum supremacy experiments, by carefully walking through a derivation of their precise mathematical definition of quantum supremacy. It's designed for advanced undergraduate or graduate students who want more information than can be provided in popular science articles, but who might not know where to begin when tackling the many research papers related to quantum supremacy.

Open paper