Compare Papers
Paper 1
Reconstruction wedges in $AdS/CFT$ with boundary fractallike structures
Ning Bao, Joydeep Naskar
- Year
- 2022
- Journal
- arXiv preprint
- DOI
- arXiv:2209.15026
- arXiv
- 2209.15026
In this work, we show the robustness of uberholography and its associated quantum error correcting code against the breakdown of entanglement wedge in the presence of highly entropic mixed states in the bulk. We show that for Cantor-set-like erasure in the boundary in $AdS_3/CFT_2$, the code distance is independent of the mixed-state entropy in the bulk in the $m\rightarrow\infty$ limit. We also show that for a Sierpinski triangle shaped boundary subregion with fractal boundary erasures in $AdS_4/CFT_3$, bulk reconstruction is possible in the presence of highly entropic mixed states in the bulk in the large $m$ regime.
Open paperPaper 2
Preservation of entanglement in local noisy channels
Priya Ghosh, Kornikar Sen, Ujjwal Sen
- Year
- 2022
- Journal
- arXiv preprint
- DOI
- arXiv:2209.04422
- arXiv
- 2209.04422
Entanglement subject to noise can not be shielded against decaying. But, in case of many noisy channels, the degradation can be partially prevented by using local unitary operations. We consider the effect of local noise on shared quantum states and evaluate the amount of entanglement that can be preserved from deterioration. The amount of saved entanglement not only depends on the strength of the channel but also on the type of the channel, and in particular, it always vanishes for the depolarizing channel. The main motive of this work is to analyze the reason behind this dependency of saved entanglement by inspecting properties of the corresponding channels. In this context, we quantify and explore the biasnesses of channels towards the different states on which they act. We postulate that all biasness measures must vanish for depolarizing channels, and subsequently introduce a few measures of biasness. We also consider the entanglement capacities of channels. We observe that the joint behaviour of the biasness quantifiers and the entanglement capacity explains the nature of saved entanglement. Furthermore, we find a pair of upper bounds on saved entanglement which are noticed to imitate the graphical nature of the latter.
Open paper