Compare Papers
Paper 1
In-Situ Simultaneous Magic State Injection on Arbitrary CSS qLDPC Codes
Kun Liu, Shifan Xu, Tomas Jochym-O'Connor, Zhiyang He, Shraddha Singh, Yongshan Ding
- Year
- 2026
- Journal
- arXiv preprint
- DOI
- arXiv:2604.05126
- arXiv
- 2604.05126
Quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes can encode many logical qubits within a single code block at low physical qubit overhead, yet magic state injection into such codes remains largely underexplored. Existing state injection proposals for qLDPC codes predominantly follow an external prepare-and-transfer paradigm, in which raw magic states are prepared outside the target code block and subsequently injected via inter-code operations. We propose the first \emph{in-situ} magic state injection: a scheme in which logical magic states are directly prepared within a qLDPC memory block, only using resources required for syndrome extraction. We show that our scheme is generalizable to any CSS qLDPC code, with examples of circuit-level simulations on the $[[144,12,12]]$ Bivariate Bicycle (BB) code and the $[[225,9,4]]$ Hypergraph Product code. We focus on a regime where correlated injection errors are negligible. In the BB code, this corresponds to a configuration that simultaneously injects four logical $|Y\rangle$ states. Under a uniform depolarizing noise model with physical error rate $10^{-3}$, this achieves an injection error rate of $1.62 \times 10^{-3}$ per logical qubit, while the correlated-error contribution is only $2 \times 10^{-5}$ per logical qubit (about $1\%$ of the injection error rate). Under a hardware-motivated asymmetric noise model where single-qubit gate errors are $10\%$ of two-qubit gate errors, the injection error rate per logical qubit falls to $ 6.7 \times 10^{-4} $, below the error rate ($ 10^{-3} $) of the two-qubit gates used to encode the magic states. Its simplicity allows our scheme to be applied to arbitrary CSS qLDPC codes using only the ancilla qubits native to syndrome extraction, and yield a reduction in space overhead relative to both prepare-and-transfer approaches and surface-code-based magic state injection schemes.
Open paperPaper 2
Absence of quantum Darwinism as a resource in secure quantum communication and computation
Bishal Kumar Das, Sourav Manna, Vaibhav Madhok
- Year
- 2025
- Journal
- arXiv preprint
- DOI
- arXiv:2510.03225
- arXiv
- 2510.03225
The emergence of classical world from underlying quantum mechanics is characterized by not only vanishing quantum correlations but also an unfolding of objectivity also known as quantum Darwinism. We show that the absence of this objectivity has a quantum advantage in cryptography and also provides the crucial missing link in efficient classical simulation of quantum circuits with zero discord. For this purpose, we consider a model of mixed state quantum computation where one is promised concordant states at all stages of the quantum circuit. A concordant quantum state has zero discord with respect to any part and there exists a basis made up of a tensor product of orthonormal local subsystem basis in which the density matrix is diagonal. Efficient classical simulation of concordant computation has surprisingly been an outstanding question in quantum information theory. We argue that a key ingredient of an efficient classical simulation algorithm, a knowledge of the local basis in which the multi-party state is diagonal, is made available by quantum Darwinism. Concordant states in the absence of quantum Darwinism cannot be efficiently simulated by existing methods and give a cryptographic advantage in communication. We show this by giving a protocol for secure quantum communication that exploits this insight. Our work also has implications for the quantum-classical border and we discuss how objectivity emerging out of Darwinism demarcates this border in three ways - empirical based on our observations and experience of objectivity, information theoretic due to the absence of any quantum correlations and lastly computational in the sense discussed above. Lastly, we show that the quantum-classical boundary as drawn by quantum Darwinism as well by what can be simulated efficiently in a mixed state quantum computation aligns with the boundary given by Hardy
Open paper