Compare Papers

Paper 1

Artificial Intelligence for Quantum Error Correction: A Comprehensive Review

Zihao Wang, Hao Tang

Year

2024

Journal

arXiv preprint

DOI

arXiv:2412.20380

arXiv

2412.20380

Quantum Error Correction (QEC) is the process of detecting and correcting errors in quantum systems, which are prone to decoherence and quantum noise. QEC is crucial for developing stable and highly accurate quantum computing systems, therefore, several research efforts have been made to develop the best QEC strategy. Recently, Google's breakthrough shows great potential to improve the accuracy of the existing error correction methods. This survey provides a comprehensive review of advancements in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools to enhance QEC schemes for existing Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) systems. Specifically, we focus on machine learning (ML) strategies and span from unsupervised, supervised, semi-supervised, to reinforcement learning methods. It is clear from the evidence, that these methods have recently shown superior efficiency and accuracy in the QEC pipeline compared to conventional approaches. Our review covers more than 150 relevant studies, offering a comprehensive overview of progress and perspective in this field. We organized the reviewed literature on the basis of the AI strategies employed and improvements in error correction performance. We also discuss challenges ahead such as data sparsity caused by limited quantum error datasets and scalability issues as the number of quantum bits (qubits) in quantum systems kept increasing very fast. We conclude the paper with summary of existing works and future research directions aimed at deeper integration of AI techniques into QEC strategies.

Open paper

Paper 2

Estimating and decoding coherent errors of QEC experiments with detector error models

Evangelia Takou, Kenneth R. Brown

Year

2025

Journal

arXiv preprint

DOI

arXiv:2510.23797

arXiv

2510.23797

Decoders of quantum error correction (QEC) experiments make decisions based on detected errors and the expected rates of error events, which together comprise a detector error model. Here we show that the syndrome history of QEC experiments is sufficient to detect and estimate coherent errors, removing the need for prior device benchmarking experiments. Importantly, our method shows that experimentally determined detector error models work equally well for both stochastic and coherent noise regimes. We model fully-coherent or fully-stochastic noise for repetition and surface codes and for various phenomenological and circuit-level noise scenarios, by employing Majorana and Monte Carlo simulators. We capture the interference of coherent errors, which appears as enhanced or suppressed physical error rates compared to the stochastic case, and also observe hyperedges that do not appear in the corresponding Pauli-twirled models. Finally, we decode the detector error models undergoing coherent noise and find different thresholds compared to detector error models built based on the stochastic noise assumption.

Open paper