Compare Papers
Paper 1
Characterizing Quantum Error Correction Performance of Radiation-induced Errors
Paul G. Baity, Anuj K. Nayak, Lav R. Varshney, Nicholas Jeon, Byung-Jun Yoon, Peter J. Love, Adolfy Hoisie
- Year
- 2026
- Journal
- arXiv preprint
- DOI
- arXiv:2602.06202
- arXiv
- 2602.06202
Radiation impacts are a current challenge with computing on superconducting-based quantum devices because they can lead to widespread correlated errors across the device. Such errors can be problematic for quantum error correction (QEC) codes, which are generally designed to correct independent errors. To address this, we have developed a computational model to simulate the effects of radiation impacts on QEC performance. This is achieved by building from recently developed models of quasiparticle density, mapping radiation-induced qubit error rates onto a quantum error channel and simulation of a simple surface code. We also provide a performance metric to quantify the resilience of a QEC code to radiation impacts. Additionally, we sweep various parameters of chip design to test mitigation strategies for improved QEC performance. Our model approach is holistic, allowing for modular performance testing of error mitigation strategies and chip and code designs.
Open paperPaper 2
Tradeoffs on the volume of fault-tolerant circuits
Anirudh Krishna, Gilles Zémor
- Year
- 2025
- Journal
- arXiv preprint
- DOI
- arXiv:2510.03057
- arXiv
- 2510.03057
Dating back to the seminal work of von Neumann [von Neumann, Automata Studies, 1956], it is known that error correcting codes can overcome faulty circuit components to enable robust computation. Choosing an appropriate code is non-trivial as it must balance several requirements. Increasing the rate of the code reduces the relative number of redundant bits used in the fault-tolerant circuit, while increasing the distance of the code ensures robustness against faults. If the rate and distance were the only concerns, we could use asymptotically optimal codes as is done in communication settings. However, choosing a code for computation is challenging due to an additional requirement: The code needs to facilitate accessibility of encoded information to enable computation on encoded data. This seems to conflict with having large rate and distance. We prove that this is indeed the case, namely that a code family cannot simultaneously have constant rate, growing distance and short-depth gadgets to perform encoded CNOT gates. As a consequence, achieving good rate and distance may necessarily entail accepting very deep circuits, an undesirable trade-off in certain architectures and applications.
Open paper