Compare Papers

Paper 1

Magic state distillation with permutation-invariant codes and a two-qubit example

Heather Leitch, Yingkai Ouyang

Year

2026

Journal

arXiv preprint

DOI

arXiv:2603.04310

arXiv

2603.04310

Magic states, by allowing non-Clifford gates through gate teleportation, are important building blocks of fault-tolerant quantum computation. Magic state distillation protocols aim to create clean copies of magic states from many noisier copies. However, the prevailing protocols require substantial qubit overhead. We present a distillation protocol based on permutation-invariant gnu codes, as small as two qubits. The two-qubit protocol achieves a 0.5 error threshold and 1/2 distillation rate, surpassing prior schemes for comparable codes. Our protocol furthermore distils magic states with arbitrary magic by varying the position of the ideal input states on the Bloch sphere. We achieve this by departing from the usual magic state distillation formalism, allowing the use of non-Clifford gates in the distillation protocol, and allowing the form of the output state to differ from the input state. Our protocol is compatible for use in tandem with existing magic state distillation protocols to enhance their performance.

Open paper

Paper 2

Tradeoffs on the volume of fault-tolerant circuits

Anirudh Krishna, Gilles Zémor

Year

2025

Journal

arXiv preprint

DOI

arXiv:2510.03057

arXiv

2510.03057

Dating back to the seminal work of von Neumann [von Neumann, Automata Studies, 1956], it is known that error correcting codes can overcome faulty circuit components to enable robust computation. Choosing an appropriate code is non-trivial as it must balance several requirements. Increasing the rate of the code reduces the relative number of redundant bits used in the fault-tolerant circuit, while increasing the distance of the code ensures robustness against faults. If the rate and distance were the only concerns, we could use asymptotically optimal codes as is done in communication settings. However, choosing a code for computation is challenging due to an additional requirement: The code needs to facilitate accessibility of encoded information to enable computation on encoded data. This seems to conflict with having large rate and distance. We prove that this is indeed the case, namely that a code family cannot simultaneously have constant rate, growing distance and short-depth gadgets to perform encoded CNOT gates. As a consequence, achieving good rate and distance may necessarily entail accepting very deep circuits, an undesirable trade-off in certain architectures and applications.

Open paper