Compare Papers
Paper 1
QGPU: Parallel logic in quantum LDPC codes
Boren Gu, Andy Zeyi Liu, Armanda O. Quintavalle, Qian Xu, Jens Eisert, Joschka Roffe
- Year
- 2026
- Journal
- arXiv preprint
- DOI
- arXiv:2603.05398
- arXiv
- 2603.05398
Quantum error correction is critical to the design and manufacture of scalable quantum computing systems. Recently, there has been growing interest in quantum low-density parity-check codes as a resource-efficient alternative to surface codes. Their adoption is hindered by the difficulty of compiling fault-tolerant logical operations. A key challenge is that logical qubits do not necessarily map to disjoint sets of physical qubits, which limits parallelism. We introduce clustered-cyclic codes, a quantum low-density parity-check code family with finite-size instances such as [[136,8,14]] and [[198,18,10]] that are competitive with state-of-the-art constructions. These codes admit a directly addressable logical basis, enabling highly parallel logical measurement layers. To leverage this structure, we propose parallel product surgery for quantum product codes. Using an auxiliary copy of the data patch and an engineered product-connection structure, the protocol performs many logical Pauli-product measurements in a single surgery round with small, fixed overhead. For clustered-cyclic codes, this yields surface-code-style maximal parallelism: up to k/2 disjoint Pauli-product measurements per round under explicit algebraic conditions. We prove that parallel product surgery preserves the code distance for hypergraph product codes and numerically verify distance preservation for the listed clustered-cyclic instances with k = 8. Finally, for the [[24,8,3]] clustered-cyclic code, treating half of the logical qubits as auxiliaries enables arbitrary parallel CNOTs on disjoint pairs; combined with symmetry-derived operations, these gates generate the full Clifford group fault-tolerantly.
Open paperPaper 2
Proofs of quantum memory
Minki Hhan, Tomoyuki Morimae, Yasuaki Okinaka, Takashi Yamakawa
- Year
- 2025
- Journal
- arXiv preprint
- DOI
- arXiv:2510.04159
- arXiv
- 2510.04159
With the rapid advances in quantum computer architectures and the emerging prospect of large-scale quantum memory, it is becoming essential to classically verify that remote devices genuinely allocate the promised quantum memory with specified number of qubits and coherence time. In this paper, we introduce a new concept, proofs of quantum memory (PoQM). A PoQM is an interactive protocol between a classical probabilistic polynomial-time (PPT) verifier and a quantum polynomial-time (QPT) prover over a classical channel where the verifier can verify that the prover has possessed a quantum memory with a certain number of qubits during a specified period of time. PoQM generalize the notion of proofs of quantumness (PoQ) [Brakerski, Christiano, Mahadev, Vazirani, and Vidick, JACM 2021]. Our main contributions are a formal definition of PoQM and its constructions based on hardness of LWE. Specifically, we give two constructions of PoQM. The first is of a four-round and has negligible soundness error under subexponential-hardness of LWE. The second is of a polynomial-round and has inverse-polynomial soundness error under polynomial-hardness of LWE. As a lowerbound of PoQM, we also show that PoQM imply one-way puzzles. Moreover, a certain restricted version of PoQM implies quantum computation classical communication (QCCC) key exchange.
Open paper