Compare Papers

Paper 1

HyperNQ: A Hypergraph Neural Network Decoder for Quantum LDPC Codes

Ameya S. Bhave, Navnil Choudhury, Kanad Basu

Year
2025
Journal
arXiv preprint
DOI
arXiv:2511.01741
arXiv
2511.01741

Quantum computing requires effective error correction strategies to mitigate noise and decoherence. Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check (QLDPC) codes have emerged as a promising solution for scalable Quantum Error Correction (QEC) applications by supporting constant-rate encoding and a sparse parity-check structure. However, decoding QLDPC codes via traditional approaches such as Belief Propagation (BP) suffers from poor convergence in the presence of short cycles. Machine learning techniques like Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) utilize learned message passing over their node features; however, they are restricted to pairwise interactions on Tanner graphs, which limits their ability to capture higher-order correlations. In this work, we propose HyperNQ, the first Hypergraph Neural Network (HGNN)- based QLDPC decoder that captures higher-order stabilizer constraints by utilizing hyperedges-thus enabling highly expressive and compact decoding. We use a two-stage message passing scheme and evaluate the decoder over the pseudo-threshold region. Below the pseudo-threshold mark, HyperNQ improves the Logical Error Rate (LER) up to 84% over BP and 50% over GNN-based strategies, demonstrating enhanced performance over the existing state-of-the-art decoders.

Open paper

Paper 2

A comprehensive survey on quantum computer usage: How many qubits are employed for what purposes?

Tsubasa Ichikawa, Hideaki Hakoshima, Koji Inui, Kosuke Ito, Ryo Matsuda, Kosuke Mitarai, Koichi Miyamoto, Wataru Mizukami, Kaoru Mizuta, Toshio Mori, Yuichiro Nakano, Akimoto Nakayama, Ken N. Okada, Takanori Sugimoto, Souichi Takahira, Nayuta Takemori, Satoyuki Tsukano, Hiroshi Ueda, Ryo Watanabe, Yuichiro Yoshida, Keisuke Fujii

Year
2023
Journal
arXiv preprint
DOI
arXiv:2307.16130
arXiv
2307.16130

Quantum computers (QCs), which work based on the law of quantum mechanics, are expected to be faster than classical computers in several computational tasks such as prime factoring and simulation of quantum many-body systems. In the last decade, research and development of QCs have rapidly advanced. Now hundreds of physical qubits are at our disposal, and one can find several remarkable experiments actually outperforming the classical computer in a specific computational task. On the other hand, it is unclear what the typical usages of the QCs are. Here we conduct an extensive survey on the papers that are posted in the quant-ph section in arXiv and claim to have used QCs in their abstracts. To understand the current situation of the research and development of the QCs, we evaluated the descriptive statistics about the papers, including the number of qubits employed, QPU vendors, application domains and so on. Our survey shows that the annual number of publications is increasing, and the typical number of qubits employed is about six to ten, growing along with the increase in the quantum volume (QV). Most of the preprints are devoted to applications such as quantum machine learning, condensed matter physics, and quantum chemistry, while quantum error correction and quantum noise mitigation use more qubits than the other topics. These imply that the increase in QV is fundamentally relevant, and more experiments for quantum error correction, and noise mitigation using shallow circuits with more qubits will take place.

Open paper